Menata Regulasi Daerah: Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum dalam Pembentukan Produk Hukum di Kabupaten Semarang

Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan

doi:10.55606/sinov.v8i1.894

Authors

Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/sinov.v8i1.894

Keywords:

Hyperregulation, Legal Analysis and Evaluation, Regional Legal Products, Regulatory Governance, Semarang Regency

Abstract

Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia affirms Indonesia as a state based on law, yet in practice Indonesia's legal system faces a structural problem of hyperregulation and overregulation, characterized by massive regulatory proliferation and regulatory disharmony without adequate corrective mechanisms. This condition is likewise reflected in Semarang Regency, which has 673 active legal products with Regional Head Regulations dominating at 77.3%, while Regional Regulation No. 10 of 2021 on the Formation of Regional Legal Products has not yet accommodated a legal analysis and evaluation mechanism. This study aims to explore the urgency of regional regulatory reform through legal analysis and evaluation mechanisms and to construct an implementation model in Semarang Regency. This study employs a prescriptive socio-legal research method with an interdisciplinary approach. The findings indicate that this condition reflects the dominance of primary rules without adequate institutionalization of secondary rules within H.L.A. Hart's perspective, while simultaneously representing a dysfunction in legal substance with cyclical impacts on legal structure and legal culture according to Lawrence M. Friedman. Therefore, a regulatory governance-based analysis and evaluation model is needed, integrating the regulatory cycle from ex ante to ex post with multistakeholder coordination and evaluation grounded in BPHN's 6-dimension framework

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azhar, M. (2019). Omnibus Law Sebagai Solusi Hiper-Regulasi Menuju Sonkronisasi Peraturan Per-Undang-Undangan di Indonesia. Administrative Law & Governance Journal, 2(1), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.14710/ihis.v%vi%i.6671

Bagian Hukum Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Semarang. (2026). Laporan Statistik Sektoral Bagian Hukum 2025.

Bix, B. H. (2018). Kelsen, hart, and legal normativity. Revus, 34. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.3984

BPHN, K. H. dan H. A. M. R. I. (2019). Pedoman Evaluasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Kemenkumham, 4(3), 47.

Busroh, F. F. (2023). Harmonisasi Regulasi di Indonesia: Simplifikasi dan Sinkronisasi untuk Peningkatan Efektivitas Hukum. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(3), 699–711.

Dassler, T. (2006). Combining theories of regulation – Proposing a framework for analysing regulatory systems worldwide. Utilities Policy, 14(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2004.12.001

Direktorat Jenderal Perundang-undangan Kementerian Hukum. (2026). Database Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Peraturan.Go.Id. https://peraturan.go.id/

Djohan, N. H. (2023). Menemukenali Efektivitas Penghapusan Perdagangan Orang dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum untuk Perempuan di Indonesia. Progressive Law and Society, 1(1), 1–13.

Djohan, N. H. (2024). Dekonstruksi Keadilan Digital: Konstruksi Hukum , Masyarakat , dan Teknologi di Era. Progressive Law and Society, 2(2), 83–91.

Forschner, B., & Haubner, D. (2019). Kein volk der gesetze: Anmerkungen zu mantovanis these der legum multitudo im römischen privatrecht∗). Zeitschrift Der Savigny-Stiftung Fur Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung, 136(1), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgr-2019-0012

Guidi, M., Guardiancich, I., & Levi-Faur, D. (2020). Modes of regulatory governance: A political economy perspective. Governance, 33(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12479

Helmi, H. (2021). Penataan Peraturan Daerah dengan Metode Omnibus Law: Urgensi dan Mekanisme. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 441–472. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.2.441-472

Howarth, D., & Stark, S. W. (2017). H.L.A. Hart’s secondary rules: What do “officials” really think? International Journal of Law in Context, 14(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552317000192

Isroji & Agus Najib. (2022). Peraturan Daerah Bernuansa Syari’ah di Indramayu dan Tasikmalaya: Agama, Politik Lokal dan Ancaman. Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 12(2), 247–272.

Karunia, A. A. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Lawrence M. Friedman. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 10(1), 115.

Kjaer, P. F., & Vetterlein, A. (2018). Regulatory governance: rules, resistance and responsibility. Contemporary Politics, 24(5), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2018.1452527

Kramer, M. H. (2021). The Legal Positivism of H. L. A. Hart. In The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism (pp. 301–324). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108636377.013

Mahfud, M. A., & Djohan, N. H. (2024). THE EXPANSION OF INVESTOR ACCESS TO CULTIVATION RIGHTS: A Socio-Legal Analysis on Agrarian Injustice in Indonesia. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1500

Muhlizi, A. F. (2017). Penataan Regulasi Dalam Mendukung Pembangunan Ekonomi Nasional. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(3), 349. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i3.191

Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan, Bima Satya Prawiranegara, & Azkiya Nur Khariza. (2024). Perluasan Subjek Penerima Bantuan Hukum bagi Masyarakat Miskin dan Rentan dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan di Kabupaten Semarang. Media Informasi Penelitian Kabupaten Semarang, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55606/sinov.v6i2.836

Rizal Irvan Amin & Achmad. (2020). Mengurai Permasalahan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik, 4(2), 205–220.

Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. (2016). Kemendagri Resmi Umumkan 3.143 Perda Yang Dibatalkan. Setkab.Go.Id. https://setkab.go.id/kemendagri-resmi-umumkan-3-143-perda-yang-dibatalkan/

Silalahi, W. (2020). Penataan Regulasi Berkualitas Dalam Rangka Terjaminnya Supremasi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 8(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.8.1.56-66

Sistyawan, D. J., Saraswati, R., Lita, T. A. L. W., Jayawibawa, M., & Aris, M. S. (2024). The Development of Positivism’s Legal Theory: From Bentham To Hart. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 9(2), 777–801. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.402

Wicipto, S. (2025). Negara Aturan atau Negara Tujuan? Meluruskan Arah Regulasi Pembangunan. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/negara-aturan-atau-negara-tujuan-meluruskan-arah-regulasi-pembangunan-lt6876107befb60/?page=2