Perluasan Subjek Penerima Bantuan Hukum bagi Masyarakat Miskin dan Rentan dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan di Kabupaten Semarang

Authors

  • Naufal Hasanuddin Djohan Universitas Diponegoro
  • Bima Satya Prawiranegara Universitas Diponegoro
  • Azkiya Nur Khariza Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/sinov.v6i2.836

Keywords:

Legal Aid, Semarang Regency, Justice, Welfare, Poor

Abstract

The subject of legal aid recipients, which is limited to the poor in Semarang Regency Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Legal Aid, opens opportunities for discriminatory and unjust law enforcement. This is due to the lack of efforts to bring basic rights, justice, and capabilities as widely as possible to the community, especially for those vulnerable in improving their welfare. Therefore, an in-depth exploration is needed to evaluate, revise, and harmonize legal aid regulations and enforcement in Semarang Regency to enhance the welfare of the poor and vulnerable.  This normative research explains the relevance of expanding legal aid subjects to the value of justice, related regional regulations, and implementing legal aid through a legislative and conceptual approach. This research shows that (1) the expansion of legal aid recipient subjects is very relevant to the concepts of justice of John Rawls and Amartya Sen whose telos is the welfare of the people in Semarang Regency; (2) the expansion of legal aid recipient subjects in Semarang Regency has differences and should be adjusted to the subject of legal aid recipients in Central Java Province by adding vulnerable communities, instead of being limited to the poor; and (3) the next expansion of legal aid recipient subjects must be implemented consequently by the entire community including law enforcement based on the effectiveness of the legal system a la Lawrance Friedman, especially on the substance, structure and legal culture of legal aid implementation. Based on this, the Semarang Regency Regional Government can evaluate, revise, and harmonize the Semarang Regency Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Legal Aid to improve and expand the subjects of legal aid recipients through progressive and humanist policies in Semarang Regency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anakpo, G., Xhate, Z., & Mishi, S. (2023). The policies, practices, and challenges of digital financial inclusion for sustainable development: The case of the developing economy. FinTech, 2(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech2020019

Aulia, M. Z. (2019). Hukum pembangunan dari Mochtar Kusuma-Atmadja: Mengarahkan pembangunan atau mengabdi pada pembangunan? Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.363-392

Budimansyah, R. L., & I. I. M. (2024). Analisis yuridis bantuan hukum gratis bagi kaum rentan ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2011 tentang bantuan hukum. Unizar Law Review, 7(1).

Chen, J. (2023). Rawls and the global original position. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 23(67), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.23.67.6

Djohan, N. H. (2023). Menemukenali efektivitas penghapusan perdagangan orang dalam mewujudkan perlindungan hukum untuk perempuan di Indonesia. Progressive Law and Society, 1(1), 1–13.

Dorn, F., et al. (2024). A bivariate relative poverty line for leisure time and income poverty: Detecting intersectional differences using distributional copulas. Review of Income and Wealth, 70(2), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12635

Faiz, P. M. (2009). Teori keadilan John Rawls. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(1), 143.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russel Sage Foundation.

Kartikasari, R. A., Maghfiroh, N., & Yuanita, E. E. (2021). Penegakan hukum kurang adil bagi rakyat miskin. Dinamika Hukum dan Masyarakat, 3, 1–6.

Karunia, A. A. (2022). Penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia dalam perspektif teori Lawrence M. Friedman. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 10(1), 115.

Krismayanti, D., Santoso, I. B., & Pura, M. H. (2020). Pelaksanaan bantuan hukum atas narapidana lapas kelas IIA Kabupaten Karawang. Singaperbangsa Law Review, 1, 1–23.

Larasati, R., et al. (2020). Construct integrated agrarian reforms based on justice. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(2), 909–928.

Latifiani, D., et al. (2022). Reconstruction of e-court legal culture in civil law enforcement. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(2), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.59993

Laurence, B. (2023). Justice in theory and practice: Debates about utopianism and political action. Philosophy Compass, 18(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12945

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications.

Nagel, T. (2003). John Rawls and affirmative action. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 39(39), 82. https://doi.org/10.2307/3134387

Payana, I. M. K. D., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Karma, N. M. S. (2020). Pemidanaan terhadap pelaku main hakim sendiri dalam kaitannya dengan kontrol sosial (social controlling). Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(2), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.2.2436.63-67

Prayitno, S. (2018). Mekanisme pembatalan peraturan daerah dan akibat hukumnya berdasarkan asas lex superiori derogat legi inferiori. Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 09(01), 19–36.

Radbruch, G. (1945). Five minutes of legal philosophy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi042

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.29339/pha.1.1.15

Rice, S. (2017). Reasoning a human right to legal aid. Sydney Law School Research Paper, 72(17), 26.

Risnawati, E., Dewa, M. J., & Tatawu, G. (2021). Analisis hukum penyelenggaraan bantuan hukum oleh pemerintah daerah. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 3(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v3i1.16505

Riyanto, B. (2018). Panduan penyelenggaraan bantuan hukum di daerah. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.

Santori, P. (2023). Augustinian roots of Rawls’s second principle of justice: Grace and fair equality of opportunity. Modern Theology, 7177. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12891

Selznick, P. N., & P. (2017). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law with a new introduction by Robert A. Kagan (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Semarang, S. D. K. (2023). Rapat evaluasi penyelenggaraan bantuan hukum Kabupaten Semarang 2022.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Anchor Books.

Sen, A. (2006). What do we want from a theory of justice? The Journal of Philosophy, 103(5), 215–238.

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Universitas Indonesia Press.

Susilo, A. B., & Yuliawan, I. (2020). Efektifitas bantuan hukum bagi masyarakat miskin di Kabupaten Semarang. Unpublished manuscript.

Wondiwoi, M. S., & N. (2023). Upaya peningkatan pada kelompok rentan khususnya pada anak dengan pendekatan pembelajaran dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(5), 11073–11080.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Djohan, N. H., Bima Satya Prawiranegara, & Azkiya Nur Khariza. (2024). Perluasan Subjek Penerima Bantuan Hukum bagi Masyarakat Miskin dan Rentan dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan di Kabupaten Semarang. Media Informasi Penelitian Kabupaten Semarang, 6(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.55606/sinov.v6i2.836

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.